|
Agriculture is the key sector of Myanmar's economy. It
provides employment to two thirds of the population, contributes 58% to the
county's GDP and 48% of its exports. However, the sector, nevertheless, has
shown mixed performance over the last two decades. The agricultural potential
is under-realised as evidenced by relatively low yields, input use, irrigation
coverage despite ample water resources and low cropping intensity in comparison
with other South and Southeast Asian countries. Malnutrition pockets exist in
various parts of the country despite overall national food
self-sufficiency.
Agricultural growth is central to any rural development
promotion effort. Broad-based and economically efficient rural growth can
significantly help to reduce rural poverty by bringing about sustainable
increase in productivity and reducing risks and vulnerability for the poorest
population. A sector review for use by government and the international donor
community to identify issues, and define broad investment needs to stimulate
broad-based agricultural growth is an essential preparatory step. The review
would include the formulation of feasible options, suitable strategies and of
action plans as a basic framework for investment decisions-by government and
external donors.
The agricultural sector review is intended to:
- Assist national institutions and the international
donor community to appreciate the large poverty reduction potential of a
broad-based agricultural and rural investments in Myanmar; - Assist
national institutions to specify a medium and long-term policies and investment
strategies within its overall planning framework that will improve the incomes
and well-being of the poorest rural communities; - Advocate increased
commitment by international donors to assist agricultural growth in Myanmar for
poverty reduction and rural sector support.
Some of the key themes expected to be covered by this
Review are:
(a) Identifying the comparative advantages of Myanmar
agriculture and sub-sectors by analysing ways and means of integrating further
market-oriented principles and policies into the agriculture sector, while
protecting the rural poor from short-term adverse effects of a transition.
(b) Upscaling community development initiatives and
identifying those schemes that are 'best practices' in terms of beneficiary
impact and sustainability; and assessing the conditions for their replicability
on a wider scale within an appropriate policy framework.
(c) Facilitating agricultural services and institutions
to operate in a more multi-disciplinary participatory manner; strengthening
research and development; improving land allocation and administration and
scaling up rural financial services.
(d) Conserving and developing land and water resources
by assessing further needs and feasibility of irrigation development from
economic and environmental aspects. |